A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has captivated countrywide notice following an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their family members house. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, therefore areas are subject matter to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically in a very delicate coastal surroundings which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their see, an allegation which has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal setting up disputes, where views of the sea are both of those extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic attempts with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In keeping with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-higher h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances, an image which includes considering that grow to be emblematic of the depth in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been intended to Acquire visual proof with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second while in the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and problems attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental security and adherence to setting up law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A personal see, insisting instead that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple basically trying to make a Paul Feely accountant family property in accordance With all the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that each one works are already performed based on Skilled assistance and approved ideas. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than building of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that lots of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Moments report about René Collier mentioned that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with neighborhood advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Skilled backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting the two the Actual physical truth in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal solution.
As the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The court have to ascertain whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment into a Particular Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and arranging circumstances. However the human component remains central: neighbours who must live together with each other prolonged following the authorized fees have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design will work at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation lengthen past that handle. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties including environmental security and house legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of purely natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will count on the court docket’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.